11/16/2023 0 Comments Clk mercedes benz kompressor![]() ![]() Contributing Editor Chris Bruce doesn't agree, and here's why:Įven in non-AMG trim, the first-gen Mercedes-Benz CLK doesn’t deserve to be counted among the worst sports cars ever made. The power windows, the complicated front wiper mechanism, and the electric heated front seats were all defective, especially during the first years of production. While, generally speaking, that was the case with the first generation CLK, the model had some annoying electrical problems that ruined the overall feeling for a reliable machine. When you buy a premium car or a vehicle that comes from a reputable German manufacturer, it’s natural to expect no major technical problems. The CLK 200 Kompressor improved the situation with its 9.1 seconds, but the expensive CLK 230 Kompressor was the first variant in the lineup to actually deliver fun behind the wheel. Who needs a four-cylinder, naturally-aspirated motor in a premium sports coupe? On paper, the 136 hp of the entry-level CLK 200 sound like enough power, but the 0-62 miles per hour (0-100 kilometers per hour) acceleration time of 11.0 seconds was totally unacceptable. Worst Sports Cars: Audi TT (first generation)Īnd that base engine.Basically, this means customers payed for an E-Class Coupe, but were getting a C-Class Coupe. But in fact, the architecture was taken from the smaller and cheaper C-Class. Let’s start with the conception – the car had the familiar four-headlight front end, first seen on the then new E-Class, and the taillights also suggested it is based on the E. And we are not talking about the range-topping AMG version, because it was super rare and expensive. The CLK was definitely not the worst sports car out there, the problem is the first generation of the model delivered less than promised. If we have to give a very short answer to that question, it would be no.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |